Advanced Search
Advanced Search

maximilien's Comments

m

maximilien 8 hours ago

That's exactly what I was suggesting. I was extrapolating from what, apparently has occurred in the world of movies which can be turned into vehicles for the promotion of products (notice the cars and consumer products that appear in film) and certain types of behaviour, such as smoking. This statement is based on articles read in the past. I wouldn't state my life on the veracity of my claim concerning movies. I'm content to read that the tabacco lobby does not pay TLE to display its models smoking. Your explanation just makes me pity Aislin and incites me to read La Boétie, Discours sur la servitude volontaire.
I think smoking, as an addiction , is a form of volontary slavery. One can also be addicted to screens - "smart" phone screens, large screens for internet, to internet itself as to television. I'm afraid of myself being addicted to some of these, especially with my subscription to two newspapers that I'll go read instead of doing what I should. I will not hit the keyboard again to further pursue this discussion.

Wednesday, January 17th, 2018 on Smoking Hot

m

maximilien 1 day ago

Poor suckers. Smoke if you wish, I don't care. I prefer not to be subject to addictions although aren't porn, and less perniciously, internet and screens generally, addictive. Cigarette companies have argued that far from costing tax payers etc. money, by spreading cancer and contributing to shorter life spans they're saving society money. Thanks fozzinsky for contributing to the funding of my retirement (actually you're not since we probably don't live in the same country). Anyway, it doesn't take courage to show smoking since I suspect that many TLE viewers would be smokers and that the payments from tabacco companies for showing such activities would more than overcome any fear that TLE editors might entertain.

Tuesday, January 16th, 2018 on Smoking Hot

m

maximilien 2 weeks ago

Do cigarette companies provide kickbacks to have models smoke as if such activity were trendy. It's not. Forget about cancer, just think about premature aging of skin.

Wednesday, January 3rd, 2018 on Smoking Hot

m

maximilien 3 months ago

Was this inspired by Marcel Duchamp?

Friday, October 20th, 2017 on WC 2

m

maximilien 7 months ago

Nastya (derived from Anastasya?) has given me pleasure since she first appeared in Metart. I could still return to those early shots for both esthetic and sexual enjoyment now. I've had no trouble joining her in her videos. Although this set has great shots of her intimate parts (I just licked my lips in anticipation of a great meal) it left me sexually indifferent. Yes, I liked looking at it. The mask undid it for me. It hid her face sufficiently to prevent me from enjoying her principal asset. I just love her face, which one can appreciate only in the last few shots of the set. Admittedly the set allows one to appreciate her legs, which I also think are stupendous, especially with the nylons that she's wearing, but that's insufficient. I need the illusion of being with her entirely; the mask breaks that illusion.
That said, any set with this model is welcomed even if not conducive to erotic fantasies.
One final comment: I'm indifferent to "kink" and find the mannequin fantasy silly. The use of the mannequin left me indifferent.

Tuesday, June 20th, 2017 on Mannequin

m

maximilien 7 months ago

What a face! To die for (picture 23). As ever I also like the her legs. They may be slightly thin, but the skirt exhibits them nicely. I'd say I'm in love (with a picture, come on, let's get serious). No but am enthralled. I haven't even gone beyond the first page of this setting. I'll leave it opened on page 24 and sneak looks as I work on my computer on other Windows (ex. window word).

Wednesday, June 14th, 2017 on Happiness

m

maximilien 7 months ago

I just love her legs, which the first few pictures bring out while she's wearing her skirt. The short skirt helps emphasize the legs. (image 4 and 6). We get what I consider a spectacular view of her legs from the back at the end of the sequence when she stands up to look over the water (image 23, 24). I looked at the accompanying video. Looking forward to joining her in a mutual search of self-pleasure, following her lead.

Tuesday, June 13th, 2017 on Sun Drenched 1

m

maximilien 1 year ago

simply lovely. I hope that an other series will follow. This one served as an appetizer.

Thursday, August 11th, 2016 on Natural Beauty

m

maximilien 2 years ago

These are things that do Nothing for me. I get turned off by seeing an attractive woman humiliated although recognize that it was all a game and that the model was consenting (and more than consenting ).

Thursday, January 7th, 2016 on Alone

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Who would find placing a gag over the mouth of a pretty woman arousing?

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2015 on Strapped

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Can't say I liked the outfit. But then I found that it was effective. It was arousing. Actually it was the model who was arousing; anything that she wore would have gotten a rise out of me.

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on Unleashed

m

maximilien 2 years ago

In total agreement with fer_realz. and also with Mitchi. Rose, I saw no evidence to support your claim that Amber was having a good time. She was going through the motions thinking of the money that she would receive when it would be all over.

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on Leashed 1

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Good lighting (for TLE that's a plus given its history of economizing on this chapter), decent, if unimaginative setting, (again given TLE's history of locating shots in ruins, that's a plus). I liked the absence of "kink". I think that the film could be enhanced if the camera man had not cropped out the eyes of the actresse. As for the actresse/model, this film does not change my rating: 6 which tells me that I don't want to download film or photos. I did download to see the film. Now I'm going to erase it from my disk.

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on My Love Dress 2

m

maximilien 2 years ago

I don't understand what happened. Logically this should at most amuse me; it seems as though I was reverting to the condition or stage of a little boy, looking at what is forbidden. But in fact I was aroused by the film. Is it the model , the meaty labia? I don't know. The only thing that I do know is that the fillm was too short. I also regret the close-ups on the area between the legs at the expense of the face. I like seeing both simultaneously.

Friday, December 18th, 2015 on The Stop

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Domination may turn on "Amber" (I doubt the veracity of that statement) but it doesn't do anything for me. It's silly, the apparatus is ugly, and the film ends up being a waste of an attractive woman.

Friday, December 18th, 2015 on Leashed 2

m

maximilien 3 months ago

Was this inspired by Marcel Duchamp?

Friday, October 20th, 2017 on WC 2

m

maximilien 1 year ago

simply lovely. I hope that an other series will follow. This one served as an appetizer.

Thursday, August 11th, 2016 on Natural Beauty

m

maximilien 7 months ago

Nastya (derived from Anastasya?) has given me pleasure since she first appeared in Metart. I could still return to those early shots for both esthetic and sexual enjoyment now. I've had no trouble joining her in her videos. Although this set has great shots of her intimate parts (I just licked my lips in anticipation of a great meal) it left me sexually indifferent. Yes, I liked looking at it. The mask undid it for me. It hid her face sufficiently to prevent me from enjoying her principal asset. I just love her face, which one can appreciate only in the last few shots of the set. Admittedly the set allows one to appreciate her legs, which I also think are stupendous, especially with the nylons that she's wearing, but that's insufficient. I need the illusion of being with her entirely; the mask breaks that illusion.
That said, any set with this model is welcomed even if not conducive to erotic fantasies.
One final comment: I'm indifferent to "kink" and find the mannequin fantasy silly. The use of the mannequin left me indifferent.

Tuesday, June 20th, 2017 on Mannequin

m

maximilien 7 months ago

What a face! To die for (picture 23). As ever I also like the her legs. They may be slightly thin, but the skirt exhibits them nicely. I'd say I'm in love (with a picture, come on, let's get serious). No but am enthralled. I haven't even gone beyond the first page of this setting. I'll leave it opened on page 24 and sneak looks as I work on my computer on other Windows (ex. window word).

Wednesday, June 14th, 2017 on Happiness

m

maximilien 7 months ago

I just love her legs, which the first few pictures bring out while she's wearing her skirt. The short skirt helps emphasize the legs. (image 4 and 6). We get what I consider a spectacular view of her legs from the back at the end of the sequence when she stands up to look over the water (image 23, 24). I looked at the accompanying video. Looking forward to joining her in a mutual search of self-pleasure, following her lead.

Tuesday, June 13th, 2017 on Sun Drenched 1

m

maximilien 2 years ago

These are things that do Nothing for me. I get turned off by seeing an attractive woman humiliated although recognize that it was all a game and that the model was consenting (and more than consenting ).

Thursday, January 7th, 2016 on Alone

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Who would find placing a gag over the mouth of a pretty woman arousing?

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2015 on Strapped

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Can't say I liked the outfit. But then I found that it was effective. It was arousing. Actually it was the model who was arousing; anything that she wore would have gotten a rise out of me.

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on Unleashed

m

maximilien 2 years ago

In total agreement with fer_realz. and also with Mitchi. Rose, I saw no evidence to support your claim that Amber was having a good time. She was going through the motions thinking of the money that she would receive when it would be all over.

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on Leashed 1

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Good lighting (for TLE that's a plus given its history of economizing on this chapter), decent, if unimaginative setting, (again given TLE's history of locating shots in ruins, that's a plus). I liked the absence of "kink". I think that the film could be enhanced if the camera man had not cropped out the eyes of the actresse. As for the actresse/model, this film does not change my rating: 6 which tells me that I don't want to download film or photos. I did download to see the film. Now I'm going to erase it from my disk.

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on My Love Dress 2

m

maximilien 2 years ago

I don't understand what happened. Logically this should at most amuse me; it seems as though I was reverting to the condition or stage of a little boy, looking at what is forbidden. But in fact I was aroused by the film. Is it the model , the meaty labia? I don't know. The only thing that I do know is that the fillm was too short. I also regret the close-ups on the area between the legs at the expense of the face. I like seeing both simultaneously.

Friday, December 18th, 2015 on The Stop

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Domination may turn on "Amber" (I doubt the veracity of that statement) but it doesn't do anything for me. It's silly, the apparatus is ugly, and the film ends up being a waste of an attractive woman.

Friday, December 18th, 2015 on Leashed 2

m

maximilien 8 hours ago

That's exactly what I was suggesting. I was extrapolating from what, apparently has occurred in the world of movies which can be turned into vehicles for the promotion of products (notice the cars and consumer products that appear in film) and certain types of behaviour, such as smoking. This statement is based on articles read in the past. I wouldn't state my life on the veracity of my claim concerning movies. I'm content to read that the tabacco lobby does not pay TLE to display its models smoking. Your explanation just makes me pity Aislin and incites me to read La Boétie, Discours sur la servitude volontaire.
I think smoking, as an addiction , is a form of volontary slavery. One can also be addicted to screens - "smart" phone screens, large screens for internet, to internet itself as to television. I'm afraid of myself being addicted to some of these, especially with my subscription to two newspapers that I'll go read instead of doing what I should. I will not hit the keyboard again to further pursue this discussion.

Wednesday, January 17th, 2018 on Smoking Hot

m

maximilien 1 day ago

Poor suckers. Smoke if you wish, I don't care. I prefer not to be subject to addictions although aren't porn, and less perniciously, internet and screens generally, addictive. Cigarette companies have argued that far from costing tax payers etc. money, by spreading cancer and contributing to shorter life spans they're saving society money. Thanks fozzinsky for contributing to the funding of my retirement (actually you're not since we probably don't live in the same country). Anyway, it doesn't take courage to show smoking since I suspect that many TLE viewers would be smokers and that the payments from tabacco companies for showing such activities would more than overcome any fear that TLE editors might entertain.

Tuesday, January 16th, 2018 on Smoking Hot

m

maximilien 2 weeks ago

Do cigarette companies provide kickbacks to have models smoke as if such activity were trendy. It's not. Forget about cancer, just think about premature aging of skin.

Wednesday, January 3rd, 2018 on Smoking Hot

R

Rose 14 hours ago

Are you suggesting we get payment from the tobbaco companies, Maxmilien? That's certain not the case! We understand that showing certain activities may be divisive... everyone has their different tastes and preferences, draws the line in a different place... we try not to judge. Aislin is a smoker and finds it a turn on, and she wanted to share that with our members.

Wednesday, January 17th, 2018 on Smoking Hot

f

fozzinsky 1 week ago

......then don't go out in the sunshine.

Sunday, January 7th, 2018 on Smoking Hot

R

Rose 2 years ago

For girls who are into restraint, the sense of loss of control and even humiliation is part of the turn on... but as we always say here, "to each his or her own"!

Thursday, January 7th, 2016 on Alone

W

Wvdgr 2 years ago

I agree, otherwise the photo set is spot on.

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2015 on Strapped

R

Rose 2 years ago

I doubt that's the case – it takes a special kind of model to do this kind of work, most girls would just not be up for it (me included!).

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on Leashed 1