Advanced Search
Advanced Search

maximilien's Comments

m

maximilien 4 days ago

Nastya (derived from Anastasya?) has given me pleasure since she first appeared in Metart. I could still return to those early shots for both esthetic and sexual enjoyment now. I've had no trouble joining her in her videos. Although this set has great shots of her intimate parts (I just licked my lips in anticipation of a great meal) it left me sexually indifferent. Yes, I liked looking at it. The mask undid it for me. It hid her face sufficiently to prevent me from enjoying her principal asset. I just love her face, which one can appreciate only in the last few shots of the set. Admittedly the set allows one to appreciate her legs, which I also think are stupendous, especially with the nylons that she's wearing, but that's insufficient. I need the illusion of being with her entirely; the mask breaks that illusion.
That said, any set with this model is welcomed even if not conducive to erotic fantasies.
One final comment: I'm indifferent to "kink" and find the mannequin fantasy silly. The use of the mannequin left me indifferent.

Tuesday, June 20th, 2017 on Mannequin

m

maximilien 1 week ago

What a face! To die for (picture 23). As ever I also like the her legs. They may be slightly thin, but the skirt exhibits them nicely. I'd say I'm in love (with a picture, come on, let's get serious). No but am enthralled. I haven't even gone beyond the first page of this setting. I'll leave it opened on page 24 and sneak looks as I work on my computer on other Windows (ex. window word).

Wednesday, June 14th, 2017 on Happiness

m

maximilien 2 weeks ago

I just love her legs, which the first few pictures bring out while she's wearing her skirt. The short skirt helps emphasize the legs. (image 4 and 6). We get what I consider a spectacular view of her legs from the back at the end of the sequence when she stands up to look over the water (image 23, 24). I looked at the accompanying video. Looking forward to joining her in a mutual search of self-pleasure, following her lead.

Tuesday, June 13th, 2017 on Sun Drenched 1

m

maximilien 10 months ago

simply lovely. I hope that an other series will follow. This one served as an appetizer.

Thursday, August 11th, 2016 on Natural Beauty

m

maximilien 1 year ago

These are things that do Nothing for me. I get turned off by seeing an attractive woman humiliated although recognize that it was all a game and that the model was consenting (and more than consenting ).

Thursday, January 7th, 2016 on Alone

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Who would find placing a gag over the mouth of a pretty woman arousing?

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2015 on Strapped

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Can't say I liked the outfit. But then I found that it was effective. It was arousing. Actually it was the model who was arousing; anything that she wore would have gotten a rise out of me.

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on Unleashed

m

maximilien 2 years ago

In total agreement with fer_realz. and also with Mitchi. Rose, I saw no evidence to support your claim that Amber was having a good time. She was going through the motions thinking of the money that she would receive when it would be all over.

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on Leashed 1

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Good lighting (for TLE that's a plus given its history of economizing on this chapter), decent, if unimaginative setting, (again given TLE's history of locating shots in ruins, that's a plus). I liked the absence of "kink". I think that the film could be enhanced if the camera man had not cropped out the eyes of the actresse. As for the actresse/model, this film does not change my rating: 6 which tells me that I don't want to download film or photos. I did download to see the film. Now I'm going to erase it from my disk.

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on My Love Dress 2

m

maximilien 2 years ago

I don't understand what happened. Logically this should at most amuse me; it seems as though I was reverting to the condition or stage of a little boy, looking at what is forbidden. But in fact I was aroused by the film. Is it the model , the meaty labia? I don't know. The only thing that I do know is that the fillm was too short. I also regret the close-ups on the area between the legs at the expense of the face. I like seeing both simultaneously.

Friday, December 18th, 2015 on The Stop

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Domination may turn on "Amber" (I doubt the veracity of that statement) but it doesn't do anything for me. It's silly, the apparatus is ugly, and the film ends up being a waste of an attractive woman.

Friday, December 18th, 2015 on Leashed 2

m

maximilien 10 months ago

simply lovely. I hope that an other series will follow. This one served as an appetizer.

Thursday, August 11th, 2016 on Natural Beauty

m

maximilien 4 days ago

Nastya (derived from Anastasya?) has given me pleasure since she first appeared in Metart. I could still return to those early shots for both esthetic and sexual enjoyment now. I've had no trouble joining her in her videos. Although this set has great shots of her intimate parts (I just licked my lips in anticipation of a great meal) it left me sexually indifferent. Yes, I liked looking at it. The mask undid it for me. It hid her face sufficiently to prevent me from enjoying her principal asset. I just love her face, which one can appreciate only in the last few shots of the set. Admittedly the set allows one to appreciate her legs, which I also think are stupendous, especially with the nylons that she's wearing, but that's insufficient. I need the illusion of being with her entirely; the mask breaks that illusion.
That said, any set with this model is welcomed even if not conducive to erotic fantasies.
One final comment: I'm indifferent to "kink" and find the mannequin fantasy silly. The use of the mannequin left me indifferent.

Tuesday, June 20th, 2017 on Mannequin

m

maximilien 1 week ago

What a face! To die for (picture 23). As ever I also like the her legs. They may be slightly thin, but the skirt exhibits them nicely. I'd say I'm in love (with a picture, come on, let's get serious). No but am enthralled. I haven't even gone beyond the first page of this setting. I'll leave it opened on page 24 and sneak looks as I work on my computer on other Windows (ex. window word).

Wednesday, June 14th, 2017 on Happiness

m

maximilien 2 weeks ago

I just love her legs, which the first few pictures bring out while she's wearing her skirt. The short skirt helps emphasize the legs. (image 4 and 6). We get what I consider a spectacular view of her legs from the back at the end of the sequence when she stands up to look over the water (image 23, 24). I looked at the accompanying video. Looking forward to joining her in a mutual search of self-pleasure, following her lead.

Tuesday, June 13th, 2017 on Sun Drenched 1

m

maximilien 1 year ago

These are things that do Nothing for me. I get turned off by seeing an attractive woman humiliated although recognize that it was all a game and that the model was consenting (and more than consenting ).

Thursday, January 7th, 2016 on Alone

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Who would find placing a gag over the mouth of a pretty woman arousing?

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2015 on Strapped

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Can't say I liked the outfit. But then I found that it was effective. It was arousing. Actually it was the model who was arousing; anything that she wore would have gotten a rise out of me.

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on Unleashed

m

maximilien 2 years ago

In total agreement with fer_realz. and also with Mitchi. Rose, I saw no evidence to support your claim that Amber was having a good time. She was going through the motions thinking of the money that she would receive when it would be all over.

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on Leashed 1

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Good lighting (for TLE that's a plus given its history of economizing on this chapter), decent, if unimaginative setting, (again given TLE's history of locating shots in ruins, that's a plus). I liked the absence of "kink". I think that the film could be enhanced if the camera man had not cropped out the eyes of the actresse. As for the actresse/model, this film does not change my rating: 6 which tells me that I don't want to download film or photos. I did download to see the film. Now I'm going to erase it from my disk.

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on My Love Dress 2

m

maximilien 2 years ago

I don't understand what happened. Logically this should at most amuse me; it seems as though I was reverting to the condition or stage of a little boy, looking at what is forbidden. But in fact I was aroused by the film. Is it the model , the meaty labia? I don't know. The only thing that I do know is that the fillm was too short. I also regret the close-ups on the area between the legs at the expense of the face. I like seeing both simultaneously.

Friday, December 18th, 2015 on The Stop

m

maximilien 2 years ago

Domination may turn on "Amber" (I doubt the veracity of that statement) but it doesn't do anything for me. It's silly, the apparatus is ugly, and the film ends up being a waste of an attractive woman.

Friday, December 18th, 2015 on Leashed 2

R

Rose 1 year ago

For girls who are into restraint, the sense of loss of control and even humiliation is part of the turn on... but as we always say here, "to each his or her own"!

Thursday, January 7th, 2016 on Alone

W

Wvdgr 2 years ago

I agree, otherwise the photo set is spot on.

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2015 on Strapped

R

Rose 2 years ago

I doubt that's the case – it takes a special kind of model to do this kind of work, most girls would just not be up for it (me included!).

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2015 on Leashed 1